Creature from the Black Lagoon
This week, we watched the film Creature from the Black Lagoon, and read two chapters from Carol Clover's Men, Women, and Chainsaws.
Though this movie cannot exactly be classified as a slasher film, it is interesting to consider its relation to the genre, along with other "occult" films. There is really no "final girl" like character to be found in the film. There is but one significant female character, and unlike a final girl she shows little in the way of perceptiveness, intelligence, or assertive authority against the monster. Instead, she seems more similar to the supporting characters in your typical slasher, who are picked off one by one. Her burgeoning femininity reinforces this connection, and puts her at odds with the typical "boyish" final girl archetype. However, like the final girl, she does ultimately survive the monster. It is not of her own wit or intelligence though, as she is rendered a damsel in distress that the men of the film take it upon themselves to rescue.
More than the explicit sex of the characters, the film's exploration of gender and sex through personality and symbols is interesting to contemplate. Most obvious is the dynamic between the masculine, assertive, prideful Mark, and the more feminine character of David. While Mark wishes to hunt the creature and penetrate it with the most phallic of weapons, David would prefer to take photographs; to remain a "feminine" spectator rather than engage the creature in a "masculine", destructive manner. As the film progresses, Mark's borderline obsession with harming and capturing the monster becomes more and more apparent, and tension grows between him and David. His eventual demise could be seen as a direct result of his urge to kill the monster. On the other side of things, David slowly comes around to using violence against the creature. While in the end he joins the others in violence against the creature, he is ultimately the one that stays the hand of his compatriot as he is about to deal the killing blow; something the late Mark surely would have foregone.
Considering old "cheesy" monster flicks like this one through an academic lens can reveal so much more than is easily and readily apparent from a cursory viewing. The use of analogues, symbols, and narrative devices to piece together an account of the film centered on sex and gender theories gives the film an entirely new meaning. In these cases, I find the aspect of intentionality interesting to contemplate. My initial impression would be that the director of this film did not place each of these elements precisely and deliberately, but rather inserted them as a result of their own internalized constructs of sex and gender. In a way, I feel that the "unintentional" aspects of an art can in a way reveal just as much as what is purposely communicated, in terms of the creator's mind, culture, and beliefs.
This is one of the most classic of the 1950s monster movies in that it established many of the tropes and the formulas for films that came after it. I think that part of the reason that it feels cheesy to contemporary viewers is that its formulas have been so overused in film and television at this point. I think your point about gender and the film is very astute as it was made when gender was very much beginning to be in flux as the immediate postwar period gave way to the social change of the 1960s.
ReplyDelete